ScholarBridge measures the communication gap between school administration and teachers about students' learning accommodations, health conditions and circumstances. The data you give here tests one hypothesis: that this gap is real, measurable, and worth closing.
It does not collect anything about named students. It records how teachers and administrators perceive and experience the flow of information — the lever that school-climate research links directly to effective learning.
We ask about the circulation of pedagogical accommodations (PAP / PAI logic), never about medical labels. A teacher needs the consequence — extra time, adapted materials — not the private condition.
Teachers and administration fill in the same instrument. Comparing the two populations is where a communication gap becomes visible and quantifiable.
Responses feed a live dashboard — distributions, role comparisons, a Communication Gap Index — turning a hard-to-run paper survey into clean, analysable data.
No login, no name, no student record. Experience is reported in banded ranges, and an optional comment field must never contain a real student's name. This is the ethical foundation that makes the dataset valid for academic use.